[patch fortran RFA] Tweak common_5.f and common_align_2.f90 for sh

[Kaz Kojima]

Hi,

gfortran.dg/common_5.f and common_align_2.f90 fail on SH
because real*8 may not be aligned at 64-bit boundary on this
target and there are no "Padding"'s expected in these tests.
The attached patch adds -mdalign target option which makes
doubles aligned at 64-bit boundaries for sh*-*-*.  The patch
is sanity checked on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
OK for trunk?

Regards,
	kaz
--
2009-08-03  Kaz Kojima  <kkojima@gcc.gnu.org>

	* gfortran.dg/common_5.f: Add -mdalign for sh.
	* gfortran.dg/common_align_2.f90: Likewise.

diff -upr ORIG/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/common_5.f trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/common_5.f
--- ORIG/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/common_5.f	2005-10-29 06:50:40.000000000 +0900
+++ trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/common_5.f	2009-08-03 10:40:03.000000000 +0900
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 C { dg-do compile }
+C { dg-options "-pedantic-errors -mdalign" { target sh*-*-* } }
 C PR 20059
 C Check that the warning for padding works correctly.
       SUBROUTINE PLOTZ
diff -upr ORIG/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/common_align_2.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/common_align_2.f90
--- ORIG/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/common_align_2.f90	2009-04-06 09:22:28.000000000 +0900
+++ trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/common_align_2.f90	2009-08-03 10:41:03.000000000 +0900
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 ! { dg-do run }
+! { dg-options "-pedantic-errors -mdalign" { target sh*-*-* } }
 ! Tests the fix for PR37614, in which the alignement of commons followed
 ! g77 rather than the standard or other compilers.
 !