Patch g++.dg/cdce3.C test for IA64 HP-UX

[Xinliang David Li]

Steve Ellcey wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 10:00 -0700, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> By the way, would it be better to define GNU_EXTENSION (instead of 
>> NO_GNU_EXTENSION) as suggested by Gerald?
>>
>> David
> 
> Probably, although it is less important now that we don't have to list
> individual targets.  I think I will go all the way and use GNU_EXTENSION
> and LARGE_LONG_DOUBLE instead of NO_GNU_EXTENSION and NO_LONG_DOUBLE in
> order to get rid of all the double negatives.
> 

Great!

Thanks,

David
> Steve Ellcey
> sje@cup.hp.com
>