Patch g++.dg/cdce3.C test for IA64 HP-UX

Steve Ellcey sje@cup.hp.com
Mon Sep 22 17:22:00 GMT 2008


On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 10:00 -0700, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> By the way, would it be better to define GNU_EXTENSION (instead of 
> NO_GNU_EXTENSION) as suggested by Gerald?
> 
> David

Probably, although it is less important now that we don't have to list
individual targets.  I think I will go all the way and use GNU_EXTENSION
and LARGE_LONG_DOUBLE instead of NO_GNU_EXTENSION and NO_LONG_DOUBLE in
order to get rid of all the double negatives.

Steve Ellcey
sje@cup.hp.com



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list