[LTO]How should be resolve a DECL with no function body?

Diego Novillo dnovillo@google.com
Fri Nov 14 15:12:00 GMT 2008


On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 08:04, Rafael Espindola <espindola@google.com> wrote:

> Just removing the decls without body from it should be enough for this bug, no?

Yes, that's likely.  IIRC, at the time that we run
pass_ipa_free_lang_specifics, functions don't yet have gimple_body()
set, but they should have DECL_SAVED_TREE set.  Doug, that's something
worth exploring.


Diego.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list