[LTO]How should be resolve a DECL with no function body?
Diego Novillo
dnovillo@google.com
Fri Nov 14 15:12:00 GMT 2008
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 08:04, Rafael Espindola <espindola@google.com> wrote:
> Just removing the decls without body from it should be enough for this bug, no?
Yes, that's likely. IIRC, at the time that we run
pass_ipa_free_lang_specifics, functions don't yet have gimple_body()
set, but they should have DECL_SAVED_TREE set. Doug, that's something
worth exploring.
Diego.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list