[patch]: PR/36180

[Richard Guenther]

On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Graham Stott
<graham.stott@btinternet.com> wrote:
> Richard,
>
>  I think the 2nd part of the patch is wrong in the sense that we don't protect
>  any of the other TARGET_FOO macros in target-def.h this way.
>
>  I think the correct solution is to remove the TARGET_RETURN_IN_MEMORY define
>  from i386.h and add it to i386.c to override the default in the same way for
>  all the other overriden TARGET_FOO macros.

Kai, would you please fix this as suggested?

Thanks,
Richard.