[Lto-team] Fwd: [tuples] reduced testcase of the libjava build failure

[Diego Novillo]

On 05/02/08 06:00, Rafael Espindola wrote:

> That is interesting. IMHO we should change GIMPLE_COND to have only a
> boolean variable. My only argument for that is that it would make the
> IL more simple, since there would be only one place to look for
> comparisons (on GIMPLE_ASSIGN).
> 
> This problems looks like a more convincing argument. What do you think about it?

We changed GIMPLE to always use canonical comparisons because they are 
more convenient than SSA_NAMEs.  A single SSA_NAME is actually less 
convenient than a comparison in most cases.


Diego.