Patch: automatic dependencies for gcc

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "David" == David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com> writes:

>> This was a really bad experience for me.  I am very unlikely to try to
>> repeat it.

David> My unsolicited take on this is:
David> This is what Stage-1 is for.
David> It is unfortunate that there were these problems, but don't let it
David> sour your outlook towards hacking on GCC.

Thanks.  I did want to say, I think the GCC community as a whole, and
Paolo in particular, has been very supportive and patient through this
patch series.

The thing that bothers me here isn't making mistakes -- I do that all
the time -- but rather that I really thought this patch was
bulletproof, that I'd tested it a lot, etc ... so I felt completely
blindsided by all the problems.  This presses a lot of buttons for me.

Tom