Renaming IS_AGGR_TYPE & co

[Mark Mitchell]

Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Mark Mitchell wrote:
>> Thank you for volunteering to working on this.
> You are welcome. Many thanks for your help, I'm almost done. I have only
> one remaining doubt (in init.c):

> should aggr (aggregate) just become class? And it's ok to replace
> IS_AGGR_TYPE with MAYBE_CLASS_TYPE_P or should be just CLASS_TYPE_P?

In all three uses of that function, we want a class type, AFAICT.  So, I 
would change the function to be is_class_type and use CLASS_TYPE_P as 
the predicate in the test.

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713