[PING][PATCH] Segfault while unwinding an invalid function pointer
Andrew Haley
aph@redhat.com
Sat Jun 21 09:55:00 GMT 2008
Pete Eberlein wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-04/msg00909.html
>
> This patch did not receive a review. If anyone could please review it,
> I would very much appreciate it.
This patch seems to have the same problems as your previous patch.
I don't think anyone much likes the idea of calling mincore() in the
unwinder. I'm guessing this is probably why it hasn't been reviewed.
I think we'd be better off without it.
Andrew.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list