Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

Ralf Wildenhues Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de
Wed Jun 18 21:05:00 GMT 2008


<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-05/msg00948.html>

* Joseph S. Myers wrote on Fri, May 16, 2008 at 02:05:35AM CEST:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> > Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > 
> > > I've now checked in the libstdc++-v3 patch, which is a reasonably obvious
> > > bug fix.  I've never had an opinion on whether other targets ought to fail
> > > link tests, hence I'm not really interested in pursuing the other part of
> > > the patch.  I'll leave that to you or Mark, if you wish.
> > 
> > I think the libstdc++-v3 change is indeed pretty obvious.
> 
> As I understand it, it's also a regression fix that should go on 4.3 
> branch as well.

This has not happened yet.  Is there anything holding it up?

Also, I've been kind of wondering.  AC_LIBTOOL_DLOPEN is also used in
libgfortran and libmudflap; the latter has no GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES though.
Do these directories never get built on newlib targets?

Thanks,
Ralf



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list