[PATCH]: (TAKE 2) Remove C++ keywords from gcc/[d-p]*.c

Gabriel Dos Reis gdr@integrable-solutions.net
Tue Jul 15 09:07:00 GMT 2008


On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Kaveh R. GHAZI <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> This patch is a revision of my C++ keyword elimination from gcc/[d-p]*.c
> in which I avoid touching files that have been modified on the tuples
> branch.  Running the following commands showed no diffs except a minor
> comment change in emit-rtl.c that is on mainline but not yet merged into
> the branch:
>
> svn diff --old=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/df-problems.c --new=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gimple-tuples-branch/gcc/df-problems.c
> svn diff --old=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/df-scan.c --new=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gimple-tuples-branch/gcc/df-scan.c
> svn diff --old=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/dse.c --new=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gimple-tuples-branch/gcc/dse.c
> svn diff --old=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/emit-rtl.c --new=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gimple-tuples-branch/gcc/emit-rtl.c
> svn diff --old=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/explow.c --new=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gimple-tuples-branch/gcc/explow.c
> svn diff --old=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/fwprop.c --new=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gimple-tuples-branch/gcc/fwprop.c
> svn diff --old=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/gcse.c --new=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gimple-tuples-branch/gcc/gcse.c
> svn diff --old=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/lcm.c --new=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gimple-tuples-branch/gcc/lcm.c
> svn diff --old=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/lower-subreg.c --new=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gimple-tuples-branch/gcc/lower-subreg.c
> svn diff --old=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/mode-switching.c --new=svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gimple-tuples-branch/gcc/mode-switching.c
>
>
> Tested in conjunction with my gcc/[bc]*.c patch on
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, no regressions.
>
> Okay for mainline?

Looks good to me.

-- Gaby



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list