[PATCH]: testsuite fixes for loadpre5.c/loadpre8.c with -fpic/-fPIC

[Kaveh R. GHAZI]

Hi Dan,

It looks like you wrote these two testcases.  They fail with -fpic/-fPIC.
The patch below fixes them, but I wanted to double check whether adding
"static" changes the nature of the testcase or not.  If you have another
approach, please let me know.

Tested via "make check" on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

Okay for mainline and 4.2?

		Thanks,
		--Kaveh


2008-01-11  Kaveh R. Ghazi  <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>

	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loadpre5.c: Use static.
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loadpre8.c: Likewise.

diff -rup orig/egcc-SVN20080110/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loadpre5.c egcc-SVN20080110/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loadpre5.c
--- orig/egcc-SVN20080110/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loadpre5.c	2008-01-03 23:34:32.000000000 +0100
+++ egcc-SVN20080110/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loadpre5.c	2008-01-11 05:31:47.000000000 +0100
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ int p;
 int r;

 __attribute__ ((noinline))
-int a(void)
+static int a(void)
 {
   return p;
 }
diff -rup orig/egcc-SVN20080110/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loadpre8.c egcc-SVN20080110/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loadpre8.c
--- orig/egcc-SVN20080110/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loadpre8.c	2008-01-03 23:34:32.000000000 +0100
+++ egcc-SVN20080110/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loadpre8.c	2008-01-11 05:41:17.000000000 +0100
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ typedef struct VEC_edge_base
 {
 }
 VEC_edge_base;
-__attribute__ ((noinline)) edge
+__attribute__ ((noinline)) static edge
 VEC_edge_base_index (const VEC_edge_base * vec_, unsigned ix_)
 {
 }
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ ei_start_1 (VEC_edge_gc ** ev)
   i.container = ev;
   return i;
 }
-__attribute__ ((noinline)) ei_next (edge_iterator * i)
+__attribute__ ((noinline)) static ei_next (edge_iterator * i)
 {
 }
 static __inline__ edge
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static __inline__ tree
 get_def_from_ptr (def_operand_p def)
 {
 }
-__attribute__ ((noinline)) tree
+__attribute__ ((noinline)) static tree
 phi_nodes (basic_block bb)
 {
 }