4.3.2 PR37945 RTEMS Socket Binding Mistake
Thu Dec 11 15:12:00 GMT 2008
Thomas Quinot wrote:
> * Joel Sherrill, 2008-12-11 :
>> This is a bug on the 4.3 branch that does NOT
>> impact the trunk because it uses a different
>> implementation which generates the right binding.
>> 2008-11-05 Joel Sherrill <email@example.com <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>>
>> * g-socthi-rtems.ad[sb]: New files.
>> * Makefile.in: Add RTEMS specific files.
> This looks to me like a very large amount of code duplication,
> significantly increasing the maintainance burden.
This code is dead after this branch so how much maintenance
is going to happen?
> I think it would be
> better to backport the changes made on trunk to accomodate this
> difference (from rev. 135709).
That would impact every target and not be picked up
by the ACATS so would require testing by hand AFAIK.
This seems like a lot of churn for very little benefit.
If you guys want to backport it, go ahead.
> [ g-socthi-rtems.adb ]
>> +-- This is the default version
> RTEMS, not default...
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
More information about the Gcc-patches