PATCH to gimplify_init_constructor for c++/38410
Tue Dec 9 18:32:00 GMT 2008
Eric Botcazou wrote:
>>> I cannot read Jason's mind, but I think that it's because the old
>>> definition "num_nonzero_elements < num_type_elements/4" cannot be true
>>> for num_type_elements smaller than 4.
> Thanks, then
> sparse = (num_nonzero_elements == 0)
> || (num_nonzero_elements < num_type_elements/4);
> would achieve the same goal without changing the definition of sparseness.
It would, but 1/4 non-zero elements still seems sparse to me. If you
think it's important, I'll do that.
More information about the Gcc-patches