[PATCH]: Omit obsolete Darwin from XFAIL for g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C

Jack Howarth howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu
Wed Dec 3 18:48:00 GMT 2008


On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:09:38AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Currently, g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C is XFAILing on
> x86_64-apple-darwin10 because of a XFAIL on darwin[1-7]*. Since
> these are all obsolete versions of darwin, this patch omits the
> *-*-darwin[1-7]* target from the XFAIL. Okay for gcc trunk?
>                    Jack
> 
> 2008-12-03  Jack Howarth  <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu>
> 
> 	* g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C: Omit XFAIL on obsolete Darwin.
> 
> Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C	(revision 142395)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C	(working copy)
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>  // __cxa_allocate_exception's emergency buffer mutex will
>  // itself call malloc(), and will fail if there is no more
>  // memory available.
> -// { dg-do run { xfail { { xstormy16-*-* *-*-darwin[1-7]* } || vxworks_rtp } } }
> +// { dg-do run { xfail { xstormy16-*-* || vxworks_rtp } } }
>  // Copyright (C) 2000, 2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>  // Contributed by Nathan Sidwell 6 June 2000 <nathan@codesourcery.com>
>  

   A minor correction to the original message. I meant to say that the
g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C is XPASSing on x86_64-apple-darwin10,
because it is being caught up in the  *-*-darwin[1-7]* target selection.
                         Jack



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list