RFA: C++ PATCH for c++/37234 (defaulted functions)

[Richard Guenther]

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
> The bug was that I was handling =default and =delete in a section that
> doesn't apply to templates; moving that code earlier in cp_function_decl
> fixes the bug.
>
> Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. As before, I think that fixes for bugs in new
> functionality should be allowed in the regression-only phase.  OK to check
> this in?  Can I also continue to check in bug fixes for other C++0x issues?

IMHO maintainers are free to make this decision themselves.  Generally
important bugs include wrong-code and rejects-valid issues even if they
are not regressions.

Richard.