Call for HPPA testers (was: [RFA:] Fix PR37170: weak-1.c regression, second edition)

Hans-Peter Nilsson hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com
Fri Aug 29 13:43:00 GMT 2008


> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:37:11 +0200
> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>

> > Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:15:12 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: "John David Anglin" <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
> 
> > > Can someone with an affected system (HPPA) pretty please test
> > > this patch, reverting 138310 and the later change, on top of my
> > > previous one?
> > 
> > Doesn't work?  .IMPORT directives are no longer generated configure fails
> > for libiberty.  Was I supposed to revert the previous changes as well?
> 
> I meant, just apply
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg02037.html> and
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg02044.html>
> (the latter with the lines including and after the last @@
> removed) to trunk.
> 
> If that doesn't work, can I see a testcase and the revision you
> used?  On which hppa target (so I can build a crosscompiler)?
> In the meantime, I'll try with the testcases you posted at the
> earlier run at
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg01989.html> and
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg02024.html> and
> for hppa-hpux (right, I should've done that before).

For hppa1.1-hpux10 (*), with and without -O2, both test-cases
above produce identical assembly code for me before and after
the two patches applied, at revision 139233, with what at a
glance seems like sufficient .IMPORT directives.

(*) Plain hppa-hpux isn't supported so please mention an exact
tuple, canonical or as recognized by config.sub.

and thanks for testing!

brgds, H-P



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list