[patch-rfc] N2179: Exception Propagation in C++

[Sebastian Redl]

Paolo Carlini wrote:
> I think it's correct, because at the same time I'm using 
> __exchange_and_add_dispatch, which essentially is a 
> __sync_fetch_and_add (*not* a |__sync_add_and_fetch as in your initial 
> patch)|. I also run your testcases through valgrind.
So basically, we've lowered the baseline to -1. OK, in that case you're 
right.

Sebastian