[lto][patch] Add a symbol table

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Diego Novillo wrote:

> On 8/19/08 6:32 AM, Rafael Espindola wrote:
> 
> > +/* FIXME: These enums should come from some header that is shared with the
> > +   plugin. */
> 
> I guess this header file should be part of the installed runtime, but I don't
> really have a good suggestion on where it should go.  Perhaps where the
> fixincludes headers go?  Or maybe we should have a liblto directory.  I think
> this may be a good way to go.

My understanding is that this header would be a host header, not a target 
one, describing an interface used by host code rather than target code, so 
it should not be installed in a target header directory.  Thus the natural 
model would be where the BFD headers go with --enable-install-libbfd, 
which is $(includedir) for native and 
$(exec_prefix)/$(host_noncanonical)/$(target_noncanonical)/include for 
cross.  If these headers do not in fact depend on the host or on the 
target (the BFD headers do) and there isn't an accompanying host library 
then the path could be simplified - but it shouldn't be a target include 
directory in any case.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com