struct function cleanup part I
Richard Guenther
richard.guenther@gmail.com
Sat Apr 5 12:34:00 GMT 2008
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> wrote:
> Hi,
> this is patch I am testing. It uses the rtl function inline accestor
> that I hope minimizes the runtime and extra line length costs while
> keeping rtl syntactically associated to cfun.
> I can go with crtl define too.
I don't see a reason to pass cfun to rtl () - so I like the crtl idea much
more. Instead of a crtl define you can use a crtl inline function
that takes no parameters, this should make the OO-esque people
happy.
Richard.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list