struct function cleanup part I

Richard Guenther richard.guenther@gmail.com
Sat Apr 5 12:34:00 GMT 2008


On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> wrote:
> Hi,
>  this is patch I am testing.  It uses the rtl function inline accestor
>  that I hope minimizes the runtime and extra line length costs while
>  keeping rtl syntactically associated to cfun.
>  I can go with crtl define too.

I don't see a reason to pass cfun to rtl () - so I like the crtl idea much
more.  Instead of a crtl define you can use a crtl inline function
that takes no parameters, this should make the OO-esque people
happy.

Richard.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list