[incremental] Patch: FYI: delay gimplification + partial cgraph revert

Tom Tromey tromey@redhat.com
Sun Sep 30 11:17:00 GMT 2007


>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com> writes:

Richard> There were concerns about memory usage regressions (it's not clear
Richard> whether the un-gimplified or the gimplified variant takes more memory).

Thanks.  I made a note to look at this.

Tom



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list