[incremental] Patch: FYI: delay gimplification + partial cgraph revert

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Diego" == Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> writes:

Diego> On 9/28/07, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Though the current patch is flawed, I think this is a good direction
>> for the compiler to go.

Diego> I agree.  Would you consider moving this into mainline when stage1
Diego> opens again?  Delaying gimplification on the C/C++ FEs is a Good
Diego> Thing.

Sure thing.  Though perhaps Michael will beat me to it :-)

Tom