Remove expand_body langhook

Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
Wed Sep 12 21:48:00 GMT 2007


Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On 9/12/07, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>> How about we delete treelang?  It adds busy-work to otherwise
>> straightforward patches, and AFAIK is not used anywhere.
> 
> Though I have to addmit, there have been only ~ 10 patches to treelang
> this year.  And of those, all have been keeping treelang up and
> running.  10 patches for 10 months is not bad to keep a small language
> around.

Well, yeah, but it's also not really doing anyone any good. :-)

It's not a big deal either way, but I'd be happy to see it go.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list