Arch-independent double-word clz expansion and a few other tweaks for bitscanning

Zack Weinberg
Mon Sep 3 18:16:00 GMT 2007

Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> Did you mean to overrule people's objections to this part of the patch?
>>  As far as I can tell it works fine as is, but.
> Thanks for asking.  And, no, I didn't mean to step on any toes; in my
> reading of the previous discussion it looked like you had answered all
> of the objections.  I'm sorry if I misread.

Well, I tried to answer them, but I never heard from them that they were 
satisfied with my responses.

> Let's leave the x86 bits out unless we hear otherwise from the x86
> maintainers.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list