[C++, diagnostic] PR 33494
Paolo Carlini
pcarlini@suse.de
Mon Oct 29 14:25:00 GMT 2007
Hi Gaby,
> Hi Paolo, could we just call pp_cxx_expression instead of the split?
>
Sure, if we can "export" the entire pp_cxx_expression we can also start
tidying a bit error.c, I started on that in the below, picking some safe
recent bits. Tested x86_64-linux. Is it ok?
By the way, in that context, I'm puzzled by the way pp_cxx_expression
deals with NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR. Is it calling itself or what?
Thanks,
Paolo.
///////////////
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: CL_33494_2
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20071029/d7017caa/attachment.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: patch_33494_2
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20071029/d7017caa/attachment-0001.ksh>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list