[patch] fix PR33855, incorrect handling of complex regs

Andrew Pinski pinskia@gmail.com
Mon Oct 22 18:08:00 GMT 2007


On 10/22/07, Michael Matz <matz@suse.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've missed the fact that we need to explicitely mark temporary variables
> of COMPLEX_TYPE and VECTOR_TYPE as gimple reg, otherwise the operand
> scanner will try to generate VOPS for it :-/  So I've added the same
> mechanism that we seem to use at all other places who call create_tmp_var
> with an unknown target type :-/

How about using make_rename_temp instead of using create_tmp_var directly?

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list