[PATCH] Fix ICE in ia64 speculation support
Jim Wilson
wilson@specifix.com
Mon Oct 15 21:57:00 GMT 2007
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 14:16 +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> Jim, sorry I missed to CC you on the original message. Is ia64 part of
> the patch OK with you?
Yes, it is OK.
You might consider putting the testcase in gcc.target/ia64 since it is
very IA-64 specific. You won't get multiple runs with different
optimizations here, but I suspect you really only need one run with -O2
or whatever to show the problem.
In the docs, unspec and unspec_volatile should be inside @code{}, and
you shouldn't be using [] to try to abbreviate here. I'd suggest
something like this:
This target hook returns nonzero if @var{x}, an @code{unspec} or
@code{unspec_volatile} operation, might cause a trap. Targets can use
this hook to enhance precision of analysis for @code{unspec} and
@code{unspec_volatile} operations. You may call @code{may_trap_p_1} to
analyze inner elements of @var{x} in which case @var{flags} should be
passed along.
--
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.specifix.com
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list