[PATCH] rvalue reference implementation for C++0x

[Doug Gregor]

On 5/25/07, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
> write_type: We still need to establish a standard mangling for this.
> I've poked the abi list again.

   <type> ::= S <type>   # rvalue reference-to

?

That reminds me that we need to establish a standard mangling for
variadic templates, too. I'll take a whack at that.

> tsubst: We generally don't control DR resolution behavior changes with
> flag_cpp0x; my impression has been that the flag is intended for
> controlling new features.

It's intended to process C++0x rather than C++98/03. The DR in
question (DR 106) came after TC1, and is in the C++0x Working Paper...
so it should only apply in C++0x mode. The DR is here... it's marked
"WP", not "TC1":

  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#106

  - Doug