[dataflow] [patch RFA] A SH specific patch

[Kenneth Zadeck]

Kaz Kojima wrote:
> Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck@naturalbridge.com> wrote:
>   
>> ok to check in both patches on the dataflow branch, thanks.
>>     
>
> Thanks for the review!  For the record, I've checked in the one
> liner for df_get_bb_dirt with the ChangeLog entry below.
>
> Regards,
> 	kaz
> --
> 2007-05-09  Kaz Kojima  <kkojima@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> 	* df-core.c (df_get_bb_dirty): Return false if df_live is null.
>
> diff -up ORIG/dataflow/gcc/df-core.c LOCAL/dataflow/gcc/df-core.c
> --- ORIG/dataflow/gcc/df-core.c	2007-05-09 06:38:17.000000000 +0900
> +++ LOCAL/dataflow/gcc/df-core.c	2007-05-09 08:45:05.000000000 +0900
> @@ -1491,7 +1491,7 @@ df_mark_solutions_dirty (void)
>  bool 
>  df_get_bb_dirty (basic_block bb)
>  {
> -  if (df)
> +  if (df && df_live)
>      return bitmap_bit_p (df_live->out_of_date_transfer_functions, bb->index);
>    else 
>      return false;
>   
btw - does the sh still bootstrap and regression test completely on the
branch?

kenny