RFA: Pass -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer to sse-10.c

Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
Mon May 7 19:50:00 GMT 2007

Jan Hubicka wrote:

> I see, -fomit-leaf-frame-pointer implies flat_omit_frame_pointer with 
> ix86_frame_pointer_required claiming the frame pointer required for all
> non-leaf functions.  I don't see reason why the unwind info would be
> wrong when it is not for -maccumulate-outgoing-args in leafs, so I would
> just add
> to the test guarding warning.

Would you be willing to test that?  I don't know enough about this part
of the compiler to be a good judge of what's going on.


Mark Mitchell
(650) 331-3385 x713

More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list