Reload bug & SRA oddness
Andrew Pinski
pinskia@gmail.com
Mon May 7 02:21:00 GMT 2007
On 5/6/07, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
> Ok, here's a consolidated version.
And the spu-elf regressions are still there.
This makes no sense
D.2296_13 = (<unnamed-signed:52>) D.2295_12;
SR.18_36 = D.2296_13;
SR.33_38 = BIT_FIELD_REF <SR.18_36, 52, 0>;
SR.33 is long long unsigned int and SR.18 is unnamed-signed:52.
Just have a cast instead of BIT_FIELD_REF.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list