[PATCH] Fix PR 29609, being able to set a breakpoint on goto/continue/break

[Tristan Gingold]

On Apr 30, 2007, at 2:15 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hm no. Actually you're right.  For the explicit goto we do need the
> separate basic block, because, as you said, we always end up stepping
> onto the break if it's treated as an implicit goto. Hmm...  But that
> still feels wrong somehow.  I need to think this over some more...
> Maybe we can still fix this in cfgexpand instead of adding extra basic
> blocks.

Hi Steven,

are you still working on this problem ?