[dataflow]: patch committed to improve -O0 performance.
Wed Mar 28 22:23:00 GMT 2007
Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> I'm wondering, many passes that use DF_LIVE could actually use
>> DF_LR. If they sum up substantially, DF_UR/DF_LIVE could become
>> optional problems.
>> A nit:
> They can, but the information is not as precise.
I mean, maybe some can without changes in code generation. Possibly
they look at liveness information only for registers that they know
to have been initialized.
More information about the Gcc-patches