Symbol visibility for gcj

[Mark Wielaard]

On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 18:18 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
> I don't believe it should cause any problems, but it is possible that
> this will break some code that was using CNI to access private symbols
> inside a DSO.  I don't think we care about that.

For CNI we seem to treat package private members as visible. Is using
package private members from CNI still supported/will it be kept
supported, or should such usage be turned into java protected members?

Cheers,

Mark