frv minmax predicate

Aldy Hernandez aldyh@redhat.com
Fri Mar 16 01:10:00 GMT 2007


>>>>> "DJ" == DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> writes:

 >> Oh, I get it now.  No, there is no reason for the duplication between
 >> minmax_operator and the insn itself.  You should be able to remove the
 >> tests from minmax_operator.  I wonder why they are there at all?

 > This, then?

Ok.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list