[FORTRAN PATCH] Reduce gfc_match_strings usage (part 2)
Sun Mar 11 21:19:00 GMT 2007
FX Coudert wrote:
>> I would be grateful if you could check its effect on the profile, FX.
> I'm sorry but I won't be able to do that. When I did the profiling, I
> was rather disappointed that front-end functions didn't score higher
> (like Brooks, my reaction was "no real potential for optimization") so I
> only made a copy of the profile and destroyed the build.
> Now, it's rather easy to do (it's shorter than a bootstrap, actually):
> ./configure --disable-bootstrap CFLAGS=-pg LDFLAGS=-pg && make. Then you
> run f951 by hand so that other subprocesses don't override its gmon.out
I had just begun my response saying "Pas de problÃ¨me", when
unfortunately, this procedure failed to work for me:
make: Nothing to be done for `all'.
Checking multilib configuration for libgcc...
# If this is the top-level multilib, build all the other
make: *** [all-multi] Illegal instruction
make: *** [all-target-libgcc] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
Alors, il y'a un problÃ¨me.
I'll see if I can find out what's wrong.
More information about the Gcc-patches