RFC: Permit relative path for --with-gxx-include-dir
Wed Mar 7 18:24:00 GMT 2007
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:56:00AM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> I don't think you said this explicitly, but perhaps your concern is
> breaking existing practice? I suppose that should have been obvious to
> me when you raised the fact that you had used the alternative syntax --
> but you should never assume competence on my part! (I thought you were
> raising the point to show that people had worked out how to do the
> obscure thing, not to show that my patch would break their world.)
> I think that's a valid and powerful objection. In that light, I
> withdraw the patch.
I hadn't actually thought about that, but you're right. I know I've
done it the other way; I was just objecting to adding a second way
when we have a de facto standard way to do it now (even though not
everyone knows about it that ought to - a documentation problem).
More information about the Gcc-patches