[PATCH] Do not set BB_SUPERBLOCK in loop-unroll.c:split_edge_and_insert
Tue Mar 6 10:36:00 GMT 2007
On 3/4/07, Zdenek Dvorak <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Therefore, Zdenek, can you live with a patch that removes the line
> > that sets BB_SUPERBLOCK in split_edge_and_insert, and adds a comment
> > with your analysis of why it might be needed but we don't know for
> > sure?
> Yes, I am now persuaded that this might be the best option.
OK, here's my proposed patch. Bootstrapped and tested and all that on
i686. I'm going to install this later this week unless I hear
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2655 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Gcc-patches