[RTL, ColdFire 24/63] Add support for a MODE_INDEX_REG_CLASS macro

Roman Zippel zippel@linux-m68k.org
Thu Mar 1 03:14:00 GMT 2007


Hi,

On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Jeffrey Law wrote:

> Even with that caveat, I still think fixing how we use
> double_reg_address_ok is a much better fix and  removes
> one of reload's (incorrect) assumptions about how addressing
> modes can be used (if indexing is valid for QImode, then it
> must be valid for other modes).

I think nobody disagrees that double_reg_address_ok is problematic, but as 
Bernd mentions it could be replaced with MODE_INDEX_REG_CLASS.

bye, Roman



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list