[patch RFA] Fix sh64 build failure after dataflow merge
Kaz Kojima
kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp
Mon Jun 18 00:05:00 GMT 2007
"Seongbae Park (¹Ã¼º¹è, ÃÃà ÷ÃÃ)" <seongbae.park@gmail.com> wrote:
>> @@ -1228,7 +1228,7 @@ move_btr_def (basic_block new_def_bb, in
>> replacement_rtx = btr_rtx;
>> else
>> replacement_rtx = gen_rtx_REG (GET_MODE (user->use), btr);
>> - validate_replace_rtx (user->insn, user->use, replacement_rtx);
>> + validate_replace_rtx (user->use, replacement_rtx, user->insn);
>> user->use = replacement_rtx;
>> }
>> }
>
> I'm not sure I can approve this patch,
> but this is definitely ok from my point of view
> (methinks this qualifies as obvious but others may beg to differ).
Thanks! Your comment makes me believe that I do the right thing
this time. I think your dataflow maintainership is ok to approve
this change because this is for a dataflow merge issue anyway, but
I'd like to wait for someone to confirm it or to approve the patch
directly.
Regards,
kaz
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list