PATCH: Libjava is broken again

[Mark Wielaard]

On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 11:53 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Mark, I wonder if the proposed patch would actually belong in classpath. 
>   That is, is there a reason why Classpath dislikes GCJ, Jikes and KJC?

That version of classpath was released when GCJ, Jikes and KJC didn't
provide full support of all the 1.5 language constructs. Since GCJ does
provide them now a feature check to see whether or not we have a GCJ
version that does support it would certainly be welcome.

Of course inside GCC you know the exact version of GCJ that you will be
using to compile the core libraries, so hardcoding it there isn't a
problem.

Cheers,

Mark
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20070604/ee4f5514/attachment.sig>