[RFA:] fix lack of #ifdef HAVE_C99_RUNTIME in builtins-20.c and elsewhere

[Geoff Keating]

On 05/07/2007, at 6:50 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:

>> From: Geoff Keating <geoffk@apple.com>
>> Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:43:28 -0700
>
>> Well, that makes sense; but then can you arrange for
>> check_effective_target_c99_math to distinguish between the case of "I
>> included builtins-config.h and it said there were no C99 functions"
>> and "builtins-config.h says I have a testsuite error"?
>
> That's not how the check_effective_* functions work; they don't
> have access to the test they are "called" from.  Or maybe I
> misunderstood your question.

Hmmm.  I guess what you really want to do is to have the  
check_effective_* pass the appropriate flags to ensure C99 support.   
Then if the testcase uses it but doesn't pass the right flags, it will  
(correctly) fail.