PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline
Roman Zippel
zippel@linux-m68k.org
Thu Jul 5 12:37:00 GMT 2007
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > The code to fold_binary was added by:
> > > r107218 | rguenth | 2005-11-19 03:29:10 -0800 (Sat, 19 Nov 2005) | 9 lines
> > >
> > > 2005-11-19 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
> > >
> > > PR middle-end/23294
> > > * fold-const.c (fold_plusminus_mult_expr): New function.
> > > (fold_binary): Use to canonicalize PLUS_EXPR and MINUS_EXPR
> > > cases, remove now unnecessary code.
> > >
> > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr23294.c: New testcase.
> > >
> > > And it looks like it was doing this transformation this way on purpose.
> > > Now as I mentioned before the way this should be done is using PRE/FRE
> > > to catch the redudent multiplication.
> >
> > I have to agree, IMHO it looks this optimization is done to early.
> > Richard, it would be great if you comment on this.
> > Thanks.
>
> No, the fold code just does canonicalization. If you remove that you
> just switch the cases that are not handled.
What makes "(i + 1) * 4" the canonical form of "(i * 4) + 4" compared to
other expressions like "(i * 4) + 8"?
> The real fix is in the
> value numberer that should value number both kinds the same.
Sorry, I have no idea what this means.
bye, Roman
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list