[patch,commited] Do not use chrecs for description of overlaps

[Daniel Berlin]

On 1/28/07, Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > >I think the right think to do is not to complicate things unless
> > >it is useful.  We do not use more elements than two now, so pretending that
> > >we do would make sense only if someone wants to extend the code.  This
> > >does not seem to be the case, on the contrary, Sebastian mentioned
> > >completely rewriting the code, basing it on the omega solver.  So I am
> > >somewhat inclined to keep the things as simple as possible.
> >
> > Okay, then could you at least assert that we don't try to build
> > conflict functions greater than the max limit?
>
> bootstrapped & regtested on x86_64, commited.

Thanks!