Wmissing-base-class-initializer (PR7651 Define -Wextra strictly in terms of other warning flags)

Gabriel Dos Reis gdr@integrable-solutions.net
Wed Jan 10 18:01:00 GMT 2007


"Manuel López-Ibáñez" <lopezibanez@gmail.com> writes:

[...]

| > | > One way to do that is that we have a summary of the kind
| > | > of messages currently controlled by -Wextra.
| > |
| > | I don't get this.
| >
| > grep warn_extra; make a "digest".
| >
| 
| It is actually extra_warnings, warn_extra doesn't exist.

Right -- you can easily see the effects of non-systematic rules :-/

| I would
| prefer the plan I proposed above because it seems to me that "digest"
| will get ignored but actual patches can be commented and discussed.

No, the digest will not be ignored; no more than patches; please send
the summary/digest to gcc-patches and a CC to me.

| Anyway, if you think that the digest is better, I will do it that way.

Thanks!

-- Gaby



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list