[PATCH] Canonical types (1/3)

[Doug Gregor]

On 1/2/07, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> wrote:
> just for a record, this is memory tester report about this patch.  I
> think all the increases (generally in between 1-2% except for extreme
> case of empty function) comes from extra field in the type tree node.
> I would be bit curious why we produce so many types for empty function
> we manage to gabrage collect somehow ;)

Thanks for the report. We knew that the patch improved compile-time
performance at the cost of higher memory utilization, but I hadn't
quanitified it.

  Cheers,
  Doug