revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 6/9 (C++ front end)

Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
Thu Feb 15 20:54:00 GMT 2007


Brooks Moses wrote:
> Mark Mitchell wrote:
>> Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>>
>>>     (build_min_nt_call_list): New function.
>>
>> I don't think there's any need for this function; just call
>> build_nt_call_list directly.  The "build_min" functions should go away;
>> they're an indirection that doesn't add anything.  (IIRC, before garbage
>> collection, they used to put things on different obstacks, but if/when
>> we move back to allocation pools, we'll handle this differently.)
>>
>> OK with that minor change.
> 
> To be clear, the minor change you're referring to is just eliminating
> build_min_nt_call_list, not eliminating the other "build_min" functions
> (such as the other one we added, build_min_non_dep_call_list), right?

Right.  I certainly don't want to spin out subprojects here.  I'm just
referring to this one function, which was an empty pass-through.

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list