PATCH: PR 29487

[Mark Mitchell]

John David Anglin wrote:
> In testing, I find that I need to xfail this test on hppa*-hp-hpux11.*.
> The linker always arranges to call f in weak1.C even with the object file
> order reversed.

Thanks for both this update and the previous one.  I'm not overly
worried about the failure, as I don't think that my patch could have
caused it.  The comdat1.C test fails before my patch, but passes with
it; in contract, the weak1.C test is just there to make sure that we
still handle weak functions the way we do without my patch.

I will add the dg-xfail, as you suggest, before check-in -- assuming
that you're HP-UX 10.10 results look OK.  (My testing succeeded on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, but these linkage issues are of course highly
dependent on the target system.)

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713