[m68k 09/13] Convert some text peepholes

[Jeffrey Law]

On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 07:38 +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote:

> It's your call, but seeing as the patch I posted has been approved,
> and is only waiting on an unapproved dependent patch, it might be
> better to hold off this discussion until either (a) that patch gets
> reviewed, or (b) the approval of the patch I posted is reversed.
> (It's only a suggestion -- doing patches against mainline is obviously
> the right thing to do, and I'm not trying to imply otherwise.
> Also, if there's something you object to in that patch -- the UNSPEC? --
> then I can try to fix it.)
Which pending patch is your peephole conversion patch dependent upon?

jeff