Clean up extern inline
Marcin Dalecki
martin@dalecki.de
Sat Feb 3 00:07:00 GMT 2007
Wiadomość napisana w dniu 2007-02-03, o godz00:42, przez Andreas
Schwab:
> Marcin Dalecki <martin@dalecki.de> writes:
>
>> Not doing so is fine with me. But *pretending* too is wrong.
>> (See: glibc/CONFORMANCE document over there).
>
> You don't know what you are talking about. That file has nothing
> to do
> with the implementation.
Ah I see one of the higher priests from the echelon has spoken. We
the uninitiated
should bow in respect?
Again: What's the problem again just to define which version of GCC
is suited to use
with which version of GLIBC and fixing your ifdef/__attribute__ hell
in header files,
instead of pretending "compatibility and portability over the whole
range" and
constantly winning about the improvement of C standard conformance
support in GCC?
As a matter of fact dependance on particular tool versions is already
indirectly the STATUS QUO in glibc, due to dependencies between
compiler version
and kernel version. (Yes I know glibc pretends to be kernel version
independent
too... but that doesn't match reality too.)
∎ Marcin Dalecki ∎
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list